Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kvm: Handle the boundary condition correctly
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2013-08-23 04:28:14
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 09:01 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Alexander Graf [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On 22.08.2013, at 12:37, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:quoted
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <redacted>Isn't this you?Yes. The patches are generated using git format-patch and sent by git send-email. That's how it always created patches for me. I am not sure if there is a config I can change to avoid having From:
Don't bother, that's perfectly fine, and git am will do the right thing. Cheers, Ben.
quoted
quoted
We should be able to copy upto count bytesWhy?Without this we end up doing + struct kvm_get_htab_buf { + struct kvm_get_htab_header header; + /* + * Older kernel required one extra byte. + */ + unsigned long hpte[3]; + } hpte_buf; even though we are only looking for one hpte entry. http://mid.gmane.org/1376995766-16526-4-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.comquoted
Alexquoted
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c index 710d313..0ae6bb6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c@@ -1362,7 +1362,7 @@ static ssize_t kvm_htab_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,lbuf = (unsigned long __user *)buf; nb = 0; - while (nb + sizeof(hdr) + HPTE_SIZE < count) { + while (nb + sizeof(hdr) + HPTE_SIZE <= count) { /* Initialize header */ hptr = (struct kvm_get_htab_header __user *)buf; hdr.n_valid = 0;@@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ static ssize_t kvm_htab_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,/* Grab a series of valid entries */ while (i < kvm->arch.hpt_npte && hdr.n_valid < 0xffff && - nb + HPTE_SIZE < count && + nb + HPTE_SIZE <= count && record_hpte(flags, hptp, hpte, revp, 1, first_pass)) { /* valid entry, write it out */ ++hdr.n_valid; -- 1.8.1.2