Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2013-06-07

Re: [PATCH 17/18] cpufreq: powerpc: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2013-06-07 05:18:24
Also in: linux-pm, lkml

On 31 May 2013 16:20, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
On 20 May 2013 10:10, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 13 May 2013 11:34, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 22 April 2013 12:19, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 9 April 2013 14:05, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 5 April 2013 12:16, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 4 April 2013 18:24, Viresh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This patch moves cpufreq driver of powerpc platform to drivers/cpufreq.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: Olof Johansson <redacted>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
Compile Tested only.

 arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig                     | 31 ----------------------
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/Makefile             |  1 -
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/Makefile           |  2 --
 drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.powerpc                    | 26 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/cpufreq/Makefile                           |  3 +++
 .../cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c  |  0
 .../cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c                       |  0
 .../cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c                       |  0
 8 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
 rename arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/cpufreq.c => drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c (100%)
 rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_32.c => drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c (100%)
 rename arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/cpufreq_64.c => drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c (100%)
Hi Deepthi,

Can you help testing this please?
Ping!!
Ping!!
Hi Benjamin,

Hope you are back from your vacations. Can you give it a try now?
Ping!!
Ping!!
Hi Rafael,

Its been more than 2 months now that this patch was first posted.
And the response from Maintainers isn't so great, irrespective of
how many times I pinged them.

This is what I think:
- It looked functionally correct to Benjamin but he wanted somebody
to actually test it.
- Arnd gave his Ack (So it looked functionally correct to him too)
- We can probably push this into linux-next now and see if somebody
complains of any breakage it has done. If not we can get it pushed for
3.11.

--
viresh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help