Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] fsl_pmc: update device bindings
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-03 22:43:21
Also in:
lkml
On 04/19/2013 05:47:38 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:
quoted hunk
From: Li Yang <redacted> =20 Signed-off-by: Li Yang <redacted> Signed-off-by: Zhao Chenhui <redacted> --- .../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pmc.txt | 59 =20 +++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) =20diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pmc.txt =20b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pmc.txt index 07256b7..f1f749f 100644--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pmc.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/pmc.txt@@ -9,15 +9,20 @@ Properties:=20 "fsl,mpc8548-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is compatible. "fsl,mpc8536-pmc" should also be listed for any chip - whose PMC is compatible, and implies deep-sleep capability. + whose PMC is compatible, and implies deep-sleep capability and + wake on user defined packet(wakeup on ARP). + + "fsl,p1022-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is + compatible, and implies lossless Ethernet capability during sleep. =20 "fsl,mpc8641d-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is compatible; all statements below that apply to "fsl,mpc8548-pmc" =20 also apply to "fsl,mpc8641d-pmc". =20 Compatibility does not include bit assignments in =20 SCCR/PMCDR/DEVDISR; these - bit assignments are indicated via the sleep specifier in each =20 device's - sleep property. + bit assignments are indicated via the clock nodes. Device which =20 has a + controllable clock source should have a "fsl,pmc-handle" property =20 pointing + to the clock node.
Please respond to the feedback given on v1: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/147177/ Also indicate, below the ---, what has changed from previous versions. -Scott=