Re: 3.7-rc7: BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
From: Li Zhong <hidden>
Date: 2013-01-15 06:59:40
Also in:
lkml
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 12:43 -0800, Christian Kujau wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 at 16:41, Li Zhong wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 19:22 -0800, Christian Kujau wrote:quoted
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 at 19:06, Christian Kujau wrote:quoted
the same thing[0] happened again in 3.7-rc7, after ~20h uptime:I found the following on patchwork, but this seems to deal with powerpc64 only, while this PowerBook G4 of mine is powerpc32: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/193414/ It looks related, but then again, I fail to parse assember...Hi Christian, Would you please help to try the following fix? I don't have a powerpc32 machine for test...The patch hasn't made it into mainline yet. Any chance that this will be included in 3.8?
I don't know... FYI, it is already in the next of ppc tree http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/benh/powerpc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next I guess it would get into 3.9, at least. Thanks, Zhong
Thanks, Christian.quoted
==============================================diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S index 9499385..cadebfd 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S@@ -439,6 +439,8 @@ ret_from_fork: ret_from_kernel_thread: REST_NVGPRS(r1) bl schedule_tail + li r3,0 + stw r3,0(r1) mtlr r14 mr r3,r15 PPC440EP_ERR42==============================================quoted
Christian.quoted
[40007.339487] [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated [69731.388717] BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low! [69731.390371] turning off the locking correctness validator. [69731.391942] Call Trace: [69731.393525] [c9a61c10] [c0009064] show_stack+0x70/0x1bc (unreliable) [69731.395152] [c9a61c50] [c0077460] save_trace+0xfc/0x114 [69731.396735] [c9a61c60] [c007be20] __lock_acquire+0x1568/0x19b8 [69731.398296] [c9a61d00] [c007c2c0] lock_acquire+0x50/0x70 [69731.399857] [c9a61d20] [c0550e28] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x5c/0x78 [69731.401419] [c9a61d40] [c054fb58] __schedule+0xd8/0x534 [69731.402972] [c9a61da0] [c0550094] _cond_resched+0x50/0x68 [69731.404527] [c9a61db0] [c0479908] dst_gc_task+0xbc/0x258 [69731.406070] [c9a61e40] [c004eeb8] process_one_work+0x1f4/0x49c [69731.407585] [c9a61e80] [c004f644] worker_thread+0x14c/0x400 [69731.409075] [c9a61eb0] [c0057634] kthread+0xbc/0xc0 [69731.410521] [c9a61f40] [c0011ad4] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x64 [...repeated 54 times...] Anyone knows what this is about? Thanks, Christian. [0] http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1211.0/03025.html