Re: [PATCH] ppc/EEH: fix crash when adding a device in a slot with DDW
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-28 12:06:27
Also in:
lkml, stable
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2012-12-28 · Re: [PATCH] ppc/EEH: fix crash when adding a device in a slot with DDW · Gavin Shan <hidden>
- 2012-12-27 · [PATCH] ppc/EEH: fix crash when adding a device in a slot with DDW · Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <hidden>
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:18:24PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 02:34:00PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:quoted
The DDW code uses a eeh_dev struct from the pci_dev. However, this is not set until eeh_add_device_late is called. Since pci_bus_add_devices is called before eeh_add_device_late, the PCI devices are added to the bus, making drivers' probe hooks to be called. These will call set_dma_mask, which will call the DDW code, which will require the eeh_dev struct from pci_dev. This would result in a crash, due to a NULL dereference. Calling eeh_add_device_late after pci_bus_add_devices would make the system BUG, because device files shouldn't be added to devices there were not added to the system. So, a new function is needed to add such files only after pci_bus_add_devices have been called.Could you please explain for a bit how did you trigger the problem? I'm not sure you got it while doing PCI hotplug or just saw the issue during system bootup stage :-)
I did a DLPAR remove followed by a DLPAR add, using drmgr -r and drmgr -a. The reason the issue is not trigerred during bootup is that there is no driver registered yet. So no driver probe will call dma_set_mask.
quoted
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 3 +++ arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 7 +++++-- arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h index b0ef738..71aac19 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ int eeh_dev_check_failure(struct eeh_dev *edev);void __init eeh_addr_cache_build(void); void eeh_add_device_tree_early(struct device_node *); void eeh_add_device_tree_late(struct pci_bus *); +void eeh_add_device_tree_files(struct pci_bus *);Since the function is going to add EEH specific sysfs files, its name would be something like "eeh_add_sysfs_files" instead of "eeh_add_device_tree_files" :-)
It's indeed a better name.
quoted
void eeh_remove_bus_device(struct pci_dev *, int); /**@@ -240,6 +241,8 @@ static inline void eeh_add_device_tree_early(struct device_node *dn) { }static inline void eeh_add_device_tree_late(struct pci_bus *bus) { } +static inline void eeh_add_device_tree_files(struct pci_bus *bus) { } +It'd better to rename the function name to "eeh_add_sysfs_files" mentioned as above.quoted
static inline void eeh_remove_bus_device(struct pci_dev *dev, int purge_pe) { } static inline void eeh_lock(void) { }diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c index 7f94f76..7b1f14c 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c@@ -1480,11 +1480,14 @@ void pcibios_finish_adding_to_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)pcibios_allocate_bus_resources(bus); pcibios_claim_one_bus(bus); + /* Fixup EEH */ + eeh_add_device_tree_late(bus); + /* Add new devices to global lists. Register in proc, sysfs. */ pci_bus_add_devices(bus); - /* Fixup EEH */ - eeh_add_device_tree_late(bus); + /* Add EEH sysfs files */ + eeh_add_device_tree_files(bus);The function name would be "eeh_add_sysfs_files" as above.quoted
} EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pcibios_finish_adding_to_bus);By the way, arch/powerpc/kernel/of_platform.c::of_pci_phb_probe is also calling to eeh_add_device_tree_late() as well. Since you have removed part of the logic from original eeh_add_device_tree_late(), which is add EEH specific sysfs files, and you put that part of logic to eeh_add_device_tree_files(). So I think you also need make the similiar change for of_pci_phb_probe() as well :-)
Good point. I will look into other call sites. However, I don't have access to other platforms to test the patch.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c index 9a04322..a667a34 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/eeh.c@@ -788,7 +788,6 @@ static void eeh_add_device_late(struct pci_dev *dev)dev->dev.archdata.edev = edev; eeh_addr_cache_insert_dev(dev); - eeh_sysfs_add_device(dev); } /**@@ -815,6 +814,29 @@ void eeh_add_device_tree_late(struct pci_bus *bus)EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eeh_add_device_tree_late); /** + * eeh_add_device_tree_files - Add EEH sysfs files for the indicated PCI bus + * @bus: PCI bus + * + * This routine must be used to add EEH sysfs files for PCI + * devices which are attached to the indicated PCI bus. The PCI bus + * is added after system boot through hotplug or dlpar. + */ +void eeh_add_device_tree_files(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ + struct pci_dev *dev; + + list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) { + eeh_sysfs_add_device(dev); + if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) { + struct pci_bus *subbus = dev->subordinate; + if (subbus) + eeh_add_device_tree_files(subbus); + } + } +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eeh_add_device_tree_files); +The function name mentioned as above.quoted
+/** * eeh_remove_device - Undo EEH setup for the indicated pci device * @dev: pci device to be removed * @purge_pe: remove the PE or notThanks, Gavin
Regards, Thadeu Cascardo.