Thread (40 messages) 40 messages, 6 authors, 2012-12-07

Re: [Patch v4 06/12] memory-hotplug: unregister memory section on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP

From: Tang Chen <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-04 09:35:10
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-mm, linux-s390, linux-sh, lkml, sparclinux

On 11/27/2012 06:00 PM, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu<redacted>

Currently __remove_section for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP does nothing. But even if
we use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, we can unregister the memory_section.

So the patch add unregister_memory_section() into __remove_section().

CC: David Rientjes<rientjes@google.com>
CC: Jiang Liu<redacted>
CC: Len Brown<redacted>
CC: Christoph Lameter<redacted>
Cc: Minchan Kim<redacted>
CC: Andrew Morton<akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro<redacted>
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu<redacted>
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang<redacted>
__remove_section() of CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP will be integrated
into one in [PATCH 08/12], so I think we can merge this patch into
[PATCH 08/12].

Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <redacted>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
  mm/memory_hotplug.c | 13 ++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index e741732..171610d 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -279,11 +279,14 @@ static int __meminit __add_section(int nid, struct zone *zone,
  #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
  static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
  {
-	/*
-	 * XXX: Freeing memmap with vmemmap is not implement yet.
-	 *      This should be removed later.
-	 */
-	return -EBUSY;
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!valid_section(ms))
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = unregister_memory_section(ms);
+
+	return ret;
  }
  #else
  static int __remove_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help