Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 6 authors, 2012-10-31

Re: [RFC][PATCH] perf: Add a few generic stalled-cycles events

From: Anshuman Khandual <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-16 05:28:46
Also in: lkml

On 10/15/2012 10:53 PM, Arun Sharma wrote:
On 10/15/12 8:55 AM, Robert Richter wrote:

[..]
quoted
Perf tool works then out-of-the-box with:

  $ perf record -e cpu/stalled-cycles-fixed-point/ ...

The event string can easily be reused by other architectures as a
quasi standard.
I like Robert's proposal better. It's hard to model all the stall events
(eg: instruction decoder related stalls on x86) in a hardware
independent way.

Another area to think about: software engineers are generally busy and
have a limited amount of time to devote to hardware event based
optimizations. The most common question I hear is: what is the expected
perf gain if I fix this? It's hard to answer that with just the stall
events.
Hardware event based optimization is a very important aspect of real world application
tuning. CPI stack analysis is a good reason why perf should have stall events as generic
ones. But I am not clear on situations where we consider adding these new generic events
into linux/perf_event.h and the situations where we should go with the sys fs interface.
Could you please elaborate on this ?

Regards
Anshuman
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help