Re: [PATCH] mm: setup pageblock_order before it's used by sparse
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2012-07-18 07:16:15
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2012-07-18 07:16:15
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 20:25 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
quoted
That means pageblock_order is always set to "MAX_ORDER - 1", not sure whether this is intended. And it has the same issue as IA64 of wasting memory if CONFIG_SPARSE is enabled.adding BenH, need to know if it is powerpc intended.quoted
So it would be better to keep function set_pageblock_order(), it will fix the memory wasting on both IA64 and PowerPC.Should setup pageblock_order as early as possible to avoid confusing.
Hrm, HPAGE_SHIFT is initially 0 because we only know at runtime what huge page sizes are going to be supported (if any). The business with pageblock_order is new to me and does look bogus today indeed. But not a huge deal either. Our MAX_ORDER is typically 9 (64K pages) or 13 (4K pages) and our standard huge page size is generally 16M so there isn't a big difference here. Still, maybe something worth looking into... Cheers, Ben.