Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2012-07-18

Re: [PATCH] mm: setup pageblock_order before it's used by sparse

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2012-07-18 07:16:15
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Mon, 2012-07-02 at 20:25 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
quoted
That means pageblock_order is always set to "MAX_ORDER - 1", not sure
whether this is intended. And it has the same issue as IA64 of wasting
memory if CONFIG_SPARSE is enabled.
adding BenH, need to know if it is powerpc intended.
quoted
So it would be better to keep function set_pageblock_order(), it will
fix the memory wasting on both IA64 and PowerPC.
Should setup pageblock_order as early as possible to avoid confusing.
Hrm, HPAGE_SHIFT is initially 0 because we only know at runtime what
huge page sizes are going to be supported (if any).

The business with pageblock_order is new to me and does look bogus today
indeed. But not a huge deal either. Our MAX_ORDER is typically 9 (64K
pages) or 13 (4K pages) and our standard huge page size is generally 16M
so there isn't a big difference here.

Still, maybe something worth looking into...

Cheers,
Ben.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help