On 06/29/2012 08:45 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 17:54 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
index 620b7ac..c9d2a7f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
@@ -130,6 +130,9 @@ void pgtable_cache_add(unsigned shift, void
(*ctor)(void *))
align = max_t(unsigned long, align, minalign);
name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pgtable-2^%d", shift);
new = kmem_cache_create(name, table_size, align, 0, ctor);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB
+ kfree(name); /* SLUB duplicates the cache name */
+#endif
PGT_CACHE(shift) = new;
pr_debug("Allocated pgtable cache for order %d\n", shift);
This is very gross ... and fragile. Also the subtle difference in
semantics between SLUB and SLAB is a VERY BAD IDEA.
I agree.
I reckon you should make the other allocators all copy the name
instead.
Thank you for the suggestion. I will do it in the next version.
Thanks, Zhong
Ben.