RE: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/watchdog: move booke watchdog param related code to prom.c
From: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-09 03:46:55
Also in:
linux-watchdog
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
.org] On Behalf Of Shaohui Xie Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 11:37 AM To: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Xie Shaohui-B21989 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/watchdog: move booke watchdog param related code to prom.c Currently, BOOKE watchdog code for checking "wdt" and "wdt_period" is in setup_32.c, it cannot be used in 64-bit, so move it to a common place prom.c, which will be shared by 32-bit and 64-bit. Also, replace the simple_strtoul with kstrtol. Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie <redacted> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.c | 24 ------------------------ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)Is not setup-common.c is better place to move this?Move out from setup_32.c does not mean it have to go into setup-common.c, I need better reason to do this.What I think that setup_32.c is for 32 bit, setup_64.c is for 64 bit and setup-common.c is for both. I am not saying that you move this to setup-common.c. I am asking why you have not used setup-common.c ? I am ok even with prom.c.[Xie Shaohui] I'm not a fan of prom.c, I did this because I see same kind=
of
early parameters checking is did in this file only, so I thought maybe I =
should
put them together. And seems setup-common.c is not the place to do comman=
d line
checking (I'm not sure about this). =20
Ok, so you are also not sure. Let us see what other guys things of this. Thanks -Bharat