Re: [PATCH 00/15] PowerMac i2c API conversions & windfarm updates
From: Andreas Schwab <hidden>
Date: 2012-04-26 11:42:03
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2012-04-19 · Re: [PATCH 00/15] PowerMac i2c API conversions & windfarm updates · Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
- 2012-04-19 · Re: [PATCH 00/15] PowerMac i2c API conversions & windfarm updates · Jean Delvare <hidden>
- 2012-04-19 · Re: [PATCH 00/15] PowerMac i2c API conversions & windfarm updates · Andreas Schwab <hidden>
- 2012-04-19 · Re: [PATCH 00/15] PowerMac i2c API conversions & windfarm updates · Andreas Schwab <hidden>
- 2012-04-19 · Re: [PATCH 00/15] PowerMac i2c API conversions & windfarm updates · Andreas Schwab <hidden>
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] writes:
In fact, can you change that define around and see if it makes it behave more like therm_pm72 overall ? IE That's the only -known- difference between the old and new driver (+/- a bug / typo / etc..)
Yes, that's make the difference for the cpu fan control. Note that MacOS (at least 10.3, which is the only one I have) drives the fans the same way as the old driver. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."