Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 5 authors, 2012-03-28

Re: [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/mpic: Use the MPIC_LARGE_VECTORS flag for FSL MPIC.

flat view

From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-27 18:47:26

On 03/27/2012 01:44 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 03/27/2012 10:21 AM, Stuart Yoder wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Kumar Gala [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mar 27, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Varun Sethi wrote:
quoted
FSL MPIC supports 16 bit vectors so our vector number space isn't
restricted to 256 vectors. We should use the MPIC_LARG_VECTORS flag
while intializing the MPIC. This also prevents us from eating in to
hardware vector number space (MSIs) while setting up internal sources.
What is driving this change?
Whats driving the change is proper handling of error interrupts.   Right
now error interrupts (muxed on int 16) are treated as a shared
interrupt source.   We want each to be handled as a individual interrupt
source...thus the desire to support more than 256 interrupts.
We don't actually need more than 256 interrupts for this (the individual
error interrupts are not counted against this).  But unless we change
how vectors are allocated, we need vectors >= 256, since we have MSIs
close enough to 256 that under the current scheme the IPIs, timers, and
such collide with the third MSI bank.
Sorry, I misremembered -- the error interrupts do count against the 256,
but only for Linux IRQ numbering purposes (not hardware vector assignment).

-Scott
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help