[PATCH 0/9] DMA engine cookie handling cleanups · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 2/9] dmaengine: move last completed cookie into generic dma_chan structure · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 3/9] dmaengine: add private header file · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 3/9] dmaengine: add private header file · H Hartley Sweeten <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 4/9] dmaengine: consolidate assignment of DMA cookies · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 5/9] dmaengine: provide a common function for completing a dma descriptor · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 6/9] dmaengine: consolidate tx_status functions · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 6/9] dmaengine: consolidate tx_status functions · H Hartley Sweeten <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 6/9] dmaengine: consolidate tx_status functions · H Hartley Sweeten <hidden> · 2012-03-06
[PATCH 6/9] dmaengine: consolidate tx_status functions · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-03-06
[PATCH 0/9] DMA engine cookie handling cleanups · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 0/9] DMA engine cookie handling cleanups · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 0/9] DMA engine cookie handling cleanups · H Hartley Sweeten <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 9/9] dmaengine: ensure all DMA engine drivers initialize their cookies · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-03-05
[PATCH 0/9] DMA engine cookie handling cleanups · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-03-05

Re: [PATCH 0/9] DMA engine cookie handling cleanups

STALE5332d SUPERSEDED

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-05 20:50:51
Also in: linux-arm-kernel

Revision v1 of 2 in this series.

Revisions (2)

2012-03-05 v1 current
2012-03-07 v2 [diff vs current]

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
[off-list ref] wrote:

This patch series cleans up the handling of cookies in DMA engine drivers.
This is done by providing a set of inline library functions for common
tasks:

Overall this looks good, but I have a problem:
patch [1/9] does not appear in any subscribed accounts (it may be on
my @stericsson.com address, will check tomorrow)

One I get hold of an ungmangled copy I can test the series on
ux500 and U300.

Is it just stuck in moderation because of size or something like that?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help