Re: [PATCH v2] bootmem/sparsemem: remove limit constraint in alloc_bootmem_section
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: 2012-02-29 18:46:24
Also in:
linux-mm
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:12:33AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 28.02.2012 [15:47:32 +0000], Mel Gorman wrote:quoted
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:33:58AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:quoted
While testing AMS (Active Memory Sharing) / CMO (Cooperative Memory Overcommit) on powerpc, we tripped the following: kernel BUG at mm/bootmem.c:483! cpu 0x0: Vector: 700 (Program Check) at [c000000000c03940] pc: c000000000a62bd8: .alloc_bootmem_core+0x90/0x39c lr: c000000000a64bcc: .sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node+0x84/0x29c sp: c000000000c03bc0 msr: 8000000000021032 current = 0xc000000000b0cce0 paca = 0xc000000001d80000 pid = 0, comm = swapper kernel BUG at mm/bootmem.c:483! enter ? for help [c000000000c03c80] c000000000a64bcc .sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node+0x84/0x29c [c000000000c03d50] c000000000a64f10 .sparse_init+0x12c/0x28c [c000000000c03e20] c000000000a474f4 .setup_arch+0x20c/0x294 [c000000000c03ee0] c000000000a4079c .start_kernel+0xb4/0x460 [c000000000c03f90] c000000000009670 .start_here_common+0x1c/0x2c This is BUG_ON(limit && goal + size > limit); and after some debugging, it seems that goal = 0x7ffff000000 limit = 0x80000000000 and sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node -> sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_pgdat_section -> alloc_bootmem_section calls return alloc_bootmem_section(usemap_size() * count, section_nr); This is on a system with 8TB available via the AMS pool, and as a quirk of AMS in firmware, all of that memory shows up in node 0. So, we end up with an allocation that will fail the goal/limit constraints. In theory, we could "fall-back" to alloc_bootmem_node() in sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node(), but since we actually have HOTREMOVE defined, we'll BUG_ON() instead. A simple solution appears to be to disable the limit check if the size of the allocation in alloc_bootmem_secition exceeds the section size. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <redacted> Cc: Dave Hansen <redacted> Cc: Anton Blanchard <redacted> Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted> Cc: Ben Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Robert Jennings <redacted> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org --- include/linux/mmzone.h | 2 ++ mm/bootmem.c | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h index 650ba2f..4176834 100644 --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h@@ -967,6 +967,8 @@ static inline unsigned long early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn) * PA_SECTION_SHIFT physical address to/from section number * PFN_SECTION_SHIFT pfn to/from section number */ +#define BYTES_PER_SECTION (1UL << SECTION_SIZE_BITS) + #define SECTIONS_SHIFT (MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS - SECTION_SIZE_BITS) #define PA_SECTION_SHIFT (SECTION_SIZE_BITS)diff --git a/mm/bootmem.c b/mm/bootmem.c index 668e94d..5cbbc76 100644 --- a/mm/bootmem.c +++ b/mm/bootmem.c@@ -770,7 +770,10 @@ void * __init alloc_bootmem_section(unsigned long size, pfn = section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr); goal = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; - limit = section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT; + if (size > BYTES_PER_SECTION) + limit = 0; + else + limit = section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT;As it's ok to spill the allocation over to an adjacent section, why not just make limit==0 unconditionally. That would avoid defining BYTES_PER_SECTION.Something like this? Andrew, presuming Mel & Johannes give their, ack this should presumably supersede the patch you pulled into -mm. Thanks, Nish ------- While testing AMS (Active Memory Sharing) / CMO (Cooperative Memory Overcommit) on powerpc, we tripped the following: kernel BUG at mm/bootmem.c:483! cpu 0x0: Vector: 700 (Program Check) at [c000000000c03940] pc: c000000000a62bd8: .alloc_bootmem_core+0x90/0x39c lr: c000000000a64bcc: .sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node+0x84/0x29c sp: c000000000c03bc0 msr: 8000000000021032 current = 0xc000000000b0cce0 paca = 0xc000000001d80000 pid = 0, comm = swapper kernel BUG at mm/bootmem.c:483! enter ? for help [c000000000c03c80] c000000000a64bcc .sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node+0x84/0x29c [c000000000c03d50] c000000000a64f10 .sparse_init+0x12c/0x28c [c000000000c03e20] c000000000a474f4 .setup_arch+0x20c/0x294 [c000000000c03ee0] c000000000a4079c .start_kernel+0xb4/0x460 [c000000000c03f90] c000000000009670 .start_here_common+0x1c/0x2c This is BUG_ON(limit && goal + size > limit); and after some debugging, it seems that goal = 0x7ffff000000 limit = 0x80000000000 and sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node -> sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_pgdat_section calls return alloc_bootmem_section(usemap_size() * count, section_nr); This is on a system with 8TB available via the AMS pool, and as a quirk of AMS in firmware, all of that memory shows up in node 0. So, we end up with an allocation that will fail the goal/limit constraints. In theory, we could "fall-back" to alloc_bootmem_node() in sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node(), but since we actually have HOTREMOVE defined, we'll BUG_ON() instead. A simple solution appears to be to unconditionally remove the limit condition in alloc_bootmem_section, meaning allocations are allowed to cross section boundaries (necessary for systems of this size). Johannes Weiner pointed out that if alloc_bootmem_section() no longer guarantees section-locality, we need check_usemap_section_nr() to print possible cross-dependencies between node descriptors and the usemaps allocated through it. That makes the two loops in sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node() identical, so re-factor the code a bit. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <redacted>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>