Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework

[PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 02/27] irq_domain: Be less verbose · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 03/27] irq_domain: Make irq_domain structure match powerpc's irq_host · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 04/27] irq_domain: convert microblaze from irq_host to irq_domain · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 05/27] irq_domain/powerpc: Use common irq_domain structure instead of irq_host · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 01/27] irq_domain: add documentation and MAINTAINERS entry. · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 07/27] irq_domain/powerpc: Eliminate virq_is_host() · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 08/27] irq_domain: Move irq_domain code from powerpc to kernel/irq · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
Re: [PATCH v5 08/27] irq_domain: Move irq_domain code from powerpc to kernel/irq · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
Re: [PATCH v5 08/27] irq_domain: Move irq_domain code from powerpc to kernel/irq · Cousson, Benoit <hidden> · 2012-02-16
Re: [PATCH v5 08/27] irq_domain: Move irq_domain code from powerpc to kernel/irq · Cousson, Benoit <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 06/27] irq_domain/powerpc: eliminate irq_map; use irq_alloc_desc() instead · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 12/27] irq_domain: Add support for base irq and hwirq in legacy mappings · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 13/27] of/address: add empty static inlines for !CONFIG_OF · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 09/27] irq_domain: remove NO_IRQ from irq domain code · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 18/27] irq_domain: constify irq_domain_ops · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 14/27] mfd: twl-core.c: Fix the number of interrupts managed by twl4030 · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 10/27] irq_domain: Remove references to old irq_host names · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 11/27] irq_domain: Replace irq_alloc_host() with revmap-specific initializers · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 17/27] irq_domain: Create common xlate functions that device drivers can use · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 16/27] irq_domain: Remove irq_domain_add_simple() · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 15/27] irq_domain: Remove 'new' irq_domain in favour of the ppc one · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 25/27] irq_domain: remove "hint" when allocating irq numbers · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 22/27] irq_domain/powerpc: constify irq_domain_ops · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 23/27] irq_domain/powerpc: Replace custom xlate functions with library functions · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 21/27] irq_domain/c6x: Use library of xlate functions · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
Re: [PATCH v5 21/27] irq_domain/c6x: Use library of xlate functions · Mark Salter <hidden> · 2012-02-21
[PATCH v5 20/27] irq_domain/c6x: constify irq_domain structures · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
Re: [PATCH v5 20/27] irq_domain/c6x: constify irq_domain structures · Mark Salter <hidden> · 2012-02-21
[PATCH v5 19/27] irq_domain/c6x: Convert c6x to use generic irq_domain support. · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 24/27] irq_domain/microblaze: Convert microblaze to use irq_domains · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 27/27] irq_domain: For NOMAP revmap, allow users to specify the largest usable virq · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
[PATCH v5 26/27] irq_domain: mostly eliminate slow-path revmap lookups · Grant Likely <hidden> · 2012-02-16
Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2012-02-16
Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-02-16
Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework · Sam Ravnborg <hidden> · 2012-02-17
Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework · Cousson, Benoit <hidden> · 2012-02-17
Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-02-17
Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework · Cousson, Benoit <hidden> · 2012-02-21

From: Sam Ravnborg <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-17 18:05:42
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, lkml

quoted

/*
 * Please do not include this file in generic code.  There is currently
 * no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held
 * within this file.
 *
 * Thanks. --rmk
 */

A quick grep indicates that we've lost this battle ;) Is the comments
still true?  Should we stop discouraging inclusion of linux/irq.h? 
Does anyone even know that it's discouraged ;)

It's still true for any platform which hasn't been converted to genirq,
as such a platform would not have asm/hw_irq.h.

In-tree only s390 is not using genirq.
All the rest are converted and provide hw_irq.h -
most of the new archs provide hw_irq via asm-generic so it does
not show up unless you look in the Kbuild file,.

	Sam

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help