Re: p1020 unstable with 3.2
From: Alexander Graf <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-02 15:20:38
On 28.12.2011, at 06:01, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:48 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:quoted
On 24.12.2011, at 07:53, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:quoted
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 17:54 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:quoted
Hi guys, While trying to test my latest patch queue for ppc kvm, I realized that even though the device trees got updated, the p1020 box still is unstable. The trace below is the one I've seen the most. It only occurs during network I/O which happens a lot on that box, since I'm running it using NFS root. As for configuration, I use kumar's "merge" branch from today and the p1020rdb.dts device tree provided in that tree. The last known good configuration I'm aware of is 3.0. Any ideas what's going wrong here?Try SLAB instead of SLUB and let me know. It -could- be a bogon in SLUB that should be fixed upstream now but I think did hit 3.2Yup, things seem a lot more stable with SLAB now :).BTW. Fix for slub should be upstream: 42d623a8cd08eb93ab221d22cee5a62618895bbf
Yup, works like a charm now again. Thanks a lot! Alex