Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ added too much idle time in /proc/stat during throughput test.
From: Fushen Chen <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-14 01:14:24
This is 2.6.32, but I think 2.6.36 is the same. Thanks, Fushen On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt < benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 00:28 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:quoted
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:quoted
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 12:42 -0800, Fushen Chen wrote:quoted
On APM82181, "vmstat" (/proc/stat) doesn't show correct idle percent, if kernel enables "CONFIG_NO_HZ" (Tickless System / Dynamic Tick). When I run wireless throughput test with heavy traffic, "vmstat"showsquoted
quoted
quoted
very high idle percent while "oprofile" shows very low idle percent. During the test, the system is idle, but network traffic uses a lotofquoted
quoted
quoted
hard IRQ and soft-irq time. "vmstat" would have the correct stats if account_idle_ticks(ticks) in kernel/time/tick-sched.c doesn't addmorequoted
quoted
quoted
idle time in "vmstat". In the same test, if I disable "CONFIG_NO_HZ" in kernel, idle percent in "vmstat" and "oprofile" would match. My APM82181 kernel configuration is "CONFIG_NO_HZ","CONFIG_HZ_250=y",quoted
quoted
quoted
"CONFIG_HZ=250", and "CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS". My question is that if kernel enables "CONFIG_NO_HZ", how wouldkernelquoted
quoted
quoted
report correct stats.Hi Thomas ! Any idea what we're doing wrong ? :-)Not really, that had been an issue before and had been fixed. Peter ????Fusen, what kernel version is this ? Cheers, Ben.