Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 6 authors, 2011-12-05

Re: oprofile callgraph support missing for common cpus

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2011-12-05 09:01:49

On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 09:50 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] wrote on 2011/11/25 06:24:32:
quoted
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 09:22 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
quoted
I forgot to ask, oprofile mentions setting -no-omit-framepointer to get
correct backtrace but I cannot turn on frame pointers for the ppc kernel.
Isn't frame pointers needed for pcc? what about user space?
PowerPC always has frame pointers, ignore that :-)
A bit late but consider this:
 .../...

Right I wasn't clear. We do have frame pointers for non-leaf functions,
and we can trace from LR when we are on a leaf function, we can use
__builtin_return_address as well.

We also explicitely prevent -fno-omit-frame-pointer, iirc, due to a bug
with older versions of gcc which could cause miscompiles under some
circumstances (though I don't remember the details).

Cheers,
Ben.

int leaf(int x)
{
	return x+3;
}

which yields(with gcc -O2 -S):
	.file	"leaf.c"
	.section	".text"
	.align 2
	.globl leaf
	.type	leaf, @function
leaf:
	addi 3,3,3
	blr
	.size	leaf, .-leaf
	.section	.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
	.ident	"GCC: (GNU) 3.4.6 (Gentoo 3.4.6-r2, ssp-3.4.6-1.0, pie-8.7.9)"


Here there is with frame pointer(I guess that the messing around with r11 and r31 is a defect?):
(With gcc -O2 -S -fno-omit-frame-pointer)

	.file	"leaf.c"
	.section	".text"
	.align 2
	.globl leaf
	.type	leaf, @function
leaf:
	stwu 1,-16(1)
	addi 3,3,3
	lwz 11,0(1)
	stw 31,12(1)
	mr 31,1
	lwz 31,-4(11)
	mr 1,11
	blr
	.size	leaf, .-leaf
	.section	.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
	.ident	"GCC: (GNU) 3.4.6 (Gentoo 3.4.6-r2, ssp-3.4.6-1.0, pie-8.7.9)"
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help