Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Add support for OpenBlockS 600
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2011-12-02 08:49:18
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 22:40 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi, On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/obs600.dts | 314 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++It'd be nice to have dtsi files for the SoCs, there's a lot of boiler plate in there. That shouldn't hold up this specific patch though.
Right definitely. One thing that I wonder tho (I haven't looked at the dtsi stuff specifically), can it "remove" a node ? Ie. The 405EX dtsi will probably expose the PCIe bridges in that specific case, but I want them out as they aren't wired and trying to use them causes a hang on this board. Another approach is to stick in a disabled property and make sure the ppc4xx_pci code checks it.
quoted
arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper | 22 ++- arch/powerpc/configs/40x/obs600_defconfig | 83 ++++++++A new single-board defconfig? On arm that is a strong NACK, I'd say it's a bad idea on powerpc as well.
The defconfigs are just there for the user sake, I find them handy myself. I have no objection (as maintainer) to having them since nowadays they are really small and can be handy for embedded systems (ie, on a tiny 405 based machine you really want to cut out the bloat you don't need). As long as the board -can- be built as part of a combo that is. So as maintainer, I think I'll keep applying a different policy than ARM in that area ;-) Cheers, Ben.