Re: [PATCH 5/7] fsl_pmc: update device bindings
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-04 20:19:55
On 11/04/2011 03:05 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 11/04/2011 07:36 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote:quoted
+ "fsl,p1022-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is + compatible, and implies lossless Ethernet capability during sleep. "fsl,mpc8641d-pmc" should be listed for any chip whose PMC is compatible; all statements below that apply to "fsl,mpc8548-pmc" also apply to "fsl,mpc8641d-pmc". Compatibility does not include bit assignments in SCCR/PMCDR/DEVDISR; these - bit assignments are indicated via the sleep specifier in each device's - sleep property. + bit assignments are indicated via the clock nodes. Device which has a + controllable clock source should have a "clk-handle" property pointing + to the clock node.Do we have any code to use this? Normally that shouldn't matter, but we already an unused binding for this. :-) Please provide rationale for doing it this way. Ideally it should probably use whatever http://devicetree.org/ClockBindings ends up being.
OK, I see the code now. Still could use some explanation. -Scott