On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:44:58 -0800, Miche Baker-Harvey [off-list ref] wrote:

Some modifications of vtermno were not done under the spinlock.

Moved assignment from vtermno and increment of vtermno together,
putting both under the spinlock.  Revert vtermno on failure.

Signed-off-by: Miche Baker-Harvey <redacted>

Does it matter?  It's normal not to lock in a function called
"init_XXX", since it's not exposed yet.

Or is it?

Thanks,
Rusty.