Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:51 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
quoted
Kumar Gala wrote:
quoted
Do we really want the generic "fsl,fpga-cpld"& "fsl,fpga-pixis"? Thi=
s seems to vague.
quoted
Yes, the PIXIS is generally register compatible across all boards. Ther=
e
quoted
may be some minor differences, but the OCM driver can work with all PIXI=
S
quoted
boards that have an PIXIS.
Is this true? Don't we have pixis and ngpixis in u-boot?
I forgot about that. Well, everything I said is true about the ngpixis,=20
so I guess I should use "ngpixis" instead of just "pixis" here. I'll have=
=20
to check if the old pixis can be used this way.
quoted
quoted
Also you need "pixis" on MPC8544DS, MPC8572DS, MPC8536DS.
Ok.
quoted
Also fpga-cpld makes no sense if we keep this. You are either a CPLD o=
r FPGA not both.
quoted
Then I don't understand what the CPLD is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_programmable_logic_device
Ok, I get it now. Is there a name for the CPLD we use on these chips?=20
I'm having a hard time getting proper documentation on the CPLD. York=20
expressed similar frustration.
Perhaps these should be called board-control devices. How about
fsl,boardcontrol-cpld
fsl,boardcontrol-ngpixis
fsl,boardcontrol-qixis
--=20
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale=