Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/mm: Fix memory_block_size_bytes() for non-pseries
From: Ingo Molnar <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-02 10:23:49
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 14:15 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:quoted
quoted
+/* WARNING: This is going to override the generic definition whenever + * pseries is built-in regardless of what platform is active at boot + * time. This is fine for now as this is the only "option" and it + * should work everywhere. If not, we'll have to turn this into a + * ppc_md. callback + */Just a small nit, please use the customary (multi-line) comment style: /* * Comment ..... * ...... goes here. */ specified in Documentation/CodingStyle.Ah ! Here goes my sneak attempts at violating coding style while nobody notices :-) No seriously, that sort of stuff shouldn't be such a hard rule... In some cases the "official" way looks nicer, on some cases it's just a waste of space, and I've grown to prefer my slightly more compact form, at least depending on how the surrounding code looks like. Since that's all powerpc arch code, I believe I'm entitled to that little bit of flexibility in how the code looks like :-) It's not like I'm GoingToPlayWithCaps() or switching to 3-char tabs :-)
It's certainly not a hard rule - but note that the file in question
(arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c) has a rather
inconsistent comment style, sometimes even within the same function:
/*
* Remove htab bolted mappings for this section of memory
*/
...
/* Ensure all vmalloc mappings are flushed in case they also
* hit that section of memory
*/
That kind of inconsistency within the same .c file and within the
same function is not defensible with a "style is a matter of taste"
argument.
As i said, it's just a small nit.
Thanks,
Ingo