Hello,
On 6/17/11, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Friday 17 June 2011 10:49:16 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
quoted
Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac
boxes with all pmac-dependant features removed and simple cleanup
applied.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_64.S | 4 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig | 8 +
arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/Makefile | 1 +
arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/cpufreq.c | 317
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 328 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/cpufreq.c
I think new cpufreq drivers should live in drivers/cpufreq, not in arch/.
We've
started moving other drivers away from arch/x86 and arch/arm already.
What about drivers/cpufreq/powerpc, or it's an unnecessary?
Should I resumbit it, or there will be massive arch/powerpc ->
drivers/cpufreq move?
--
With best wishes
Dmitry