Re: [BUG] rebuild_sched_domains considered dangerous
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-03-09 13:34:10
Also in:
lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-03-09 13:34:10
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:31 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
quoted
But if you don't also update the cpu->node memory mappings (which I think it near impossible) what good is it to change the scheduler topology?=20 The memory for the different LPARs is striped over all nodes (or books as=
we
call them). We heavily rely on the large shared cache between the books t=
o hide
the different memory access latencies.=20
Right, so effectively you don't have NUMA due to that striping. So why then change the CPU topology? Simply create a topology without NUMA and keep it static, that accurately reflects the memory topology.