Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 5 authors, 2011-06-03

Re: [BUG] rebuild_sched_domains considered dangerous

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-03-09 13:34:10
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:31 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
quoted
But if you don't also update the cpu->node memory mappings (which I
think it near impossible) what good is it to change the scheduler
topology?
=20
The memory for the different LPARs is striped over all nodes (or books as=
 we
call them). We heavily rely on the large shared cache between the books t=
o hide
the different memory access latencies.=20
Right, so effectively you don't have NUMA due to that striping. So why
then change the CPU topology? Simply create a topology without NUMA and
keep it static, that accurately reflects the memory topology.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help