Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 8 authors, 2011-02-09
DORMANTno replies

Re: [PATCH] sched: provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to smp_send_reschedule()

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-02-09 09:37:24
Also in: linux-alpha, linux-arch, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mips, linux-um, virtualization, xen-devel

On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 17:14 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:54 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 10:26 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
You missed:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index 9813605..467d122 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ void smp_message_recv(int msg)
                break;
        case PPC_MSG_RESCHEDULE:
                /* we notice need_resched on exit */
+               scheduler_ipi();
                break;
        case PPC_MSG_CALL_FUNC_SINGLE:
                generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt();
Fold that in and add:

Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Thanks Ben!
BTW. I we lurking at some of our CPU hotplug code and I think I cannot
totally guarantee that this won't be called on an offline CPU. If that's
a problem, you may want to add a test for that.

IE. The call function IPIs are normally not going to be sent to an
offlined CPU, and stop_machine should be a good enough fence here, but
we do abuse reschedule for a number of things (including in some case
to wake up a sleeping CPU that was pseudo-offlined :-)
Hmm, I _think_ that should all work out nicely, but we'll see, if when
this stuff hits the tree powerpc machines start falling over we'd better
put that check in ;-)

Meanwhile I'm going to preserve this comment in the changelog of this
patch so we don't forget.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help