Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] powerpc: Open PIC binding and "pic-no-reset"
From: Meador Inge <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-11 03:26:07
Also in:
linux-devicetree
Apologies for the bad post. =A0Bad day for email ... =A0Please ignore the top reply in my previous reply. =A0The full reply is the below the quote. On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Meador Inge [off-list ref] wrote= :
On 02/10/2011 02:42 PM, Meador Inge wrote:quoted
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Meador Inge<redacted> Date: Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:25 PM Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] powerpc: Open PIC binding and "pic-no-reset" To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Hollis Blanchard< hollis_blanchard@mentor.com> This patch set provides a binding for Open PIC and implements support fo=
r
quoted
a new property, specified by that binding, called "pic-no-reset". =A0Wit=
h
quoted
"pic-no-reset" in place the "protected-sources" property is no longer ne=
eded
quoted
and its full implementation was removed. =A0"protected-sources" is still checked for, however, for legacy purposes. For v3 of this patch the Open PIC binding was changed to be more consist=
ent
quoted
with existing bindings, several DTS files were cleaned up, "no-reset" wa=
s
quoted
changed to "pic-no-reset", and a check to treat "protected-sources" as a synonym for "pic-no-reset" was added.
From the feedback I have received so far, the fundamental ideas in
this patch set are sane. =A0However, the following issues still need agreement: =A0 =A01. What should be the name of the no reset property? =A0 =A0 =A0 "pic-no-reset" or "no-reset"? =A0 =A02. Should we just keep the existing protected sources implementatio= n =A0 =A0 =A0 in place? For (1), I prefer "no-reset". =A0For (2), I still think that we can make "no-reset" a synonym for "protected-sources" and that things will work out. Ben, you said that you would really like to leave the protected sources implementation alone. =A0Is the mechanism implemented in "PATCH v3 3/4" [1] of having "protected-sources" as a synonym for "pic-no-reset" not suitable? [1] http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2011-February/088262.htm= l -- Meador Inge =A0 =A0 | meador_inge AT mentor.com Mentor Embedded | http://www.mentor.com/embedded-software