RE: [PATCH 3/4][v2] fsl_rio: move machine_check handler into machine_check_e500 & machine_check_e500mc
From: Bounine, Alexandre <hidden>
Date: 2010-11-11 14:29:48
Also in:
lkml
From: Bounine, Alexandre <hidden>
Date: 2010-11-11 14:29:48
Also in:
lkml
Kumar Gala [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -527,8 +535,12 @@ int machine_check_e500(struct pt_regs *regs)=20 To deal w/Alex's comment do: =20 machine_check_e500(...) { =20 int ret =3D 0; =20 =20quoted
printk("Bus - Write Address Error\n"); if (reason & MCSR_BUS_IBERR) printk("Bus - Instruction Data Error\n"); - if (reason & MCSR_BUS_RBERR) + if (reason & MCSR_BUS_RBERR) { printk("Bus - Read Data Bus Error\n"); +#ifdef CONFIG_RAPIDIO + fsl_rio_mcheck_exception(regs); +#endif=20 make this like 'ret =3D fsl_rio... =20
Please, place it in the beginning of the machine_check_e500[mc](...) as well to avoid any 'printk' if RIO exception was handled properly. Alex.=20