Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2010-10-19 04:56:48
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2010-10-19 04:56:48
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
Hi again, On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:48:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c between commit
cf9efce0ce3136fa076f53e53154e98455229514 ("powerpc: Account time using
timebase rather than PURR") from the powerpc tree and commit
e360adbe29241a0194e10e20595360dd7b98a2b3 ("irq_work: Add generic hardirq
context callbacks") from the tip tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up and can carry the fix as necessary.I forgot the merge diff, sorry: diff --cc arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c index 644f918,54888eb..0000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/time.c@@@ -578,9 -585,11 +578,9 @@@ void timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs * r
old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
irq_enter();
- if (test_perf_event_pending()) {
- clear_perf_event_pending();
- perf_event_do_pending();
- calculate_steal_time();
-
+ if (test_irq_work_pending()) {
+ clear_irq_work_pending();
+ irq_work_run();
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au