Re: [PATCH] fsldma: add support to 36-bit physical address
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-21 21:49:50
Also in:
lkml
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2010-09-21 21:49:50
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 16:43:12 -0500 Timur Tabi [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Scott Wood [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This doesn't control allocation (it probably should with dma_alloc_coherent, though I don't see it in the code), it controls whether swiotlb will create a bounce buffer -- defeating the point of using DMA to accelerate a memcpy.But it would do that only for the 'dev' used in the dma_set_mask() call. That dev is only used here: chan->desc_pool = dma_pool_create("fsl_dma_engine_desc_pool", chan->dev, sizeof(struct fsl_desc_sw), __alignof__(struct fsl_desc_sw), 0); Since we don't DMA the descriptors themselves, I just don't see how this patch does anything.
Look in dmaengine.c, there are calls to dma_map_single() and dma_map_page(), using what I assume is that same device pointer -- unless there's confusion between the channel and the controller. -Scott