On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:34:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Tuesday 27 July 2010, Grant Likely wrote:

quoted

quoted

I suggest to go back to v2 of your patch where you use asm-generic/of.h.

Stephen suggested dropping asm-generic/of.h.  I'm happy to do it either way.

I don't mind adding stuff to asm-generic, but I think in this case it would
be easier to keep this in linux/of.h because there is nothing wrong with
all architectures including it.

Most files in asm-generic are there only for historical reasons, where some
architectures use them but others don't. IMHO we should use the include/linux
headers preferred for new stuff though.

Hi Arnd.

Thanks for this explanation. Obviously my previous post
about asm-generic was wrong (as Grant already indicated).

	Sam