Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2010-06-13

Re: Request review of device tree documentation

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2010-06-12 22:52:12
Also in: linux-devicetree

On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 06:30 -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
I'm certainly going to try keeping OFW alive.  On the x86 OLPC machines, 
the ability to
dive into OFW via a SysRq key combo was very helpful for debugging some 
difficult
problems.  The team has asked me to support the feature on ARM.
Oh well, if you can and can convince the ARM kernel folks to do the
necessary changes ... :-)

One thing tho, you will only benefit from the whole infrastructure we
have created accross platforms in linux if the device-tree is "sucked"
into linux at boot. IE. Linux will not do constant accesses to OF for
the DT. Even sparc converted to that now.

That means that if your device-tree has a dynamic nature, we'll need to
come up with a way to inform the kernel of changes in it so it can
update it's copy accordingly.

We also don't have much mechanisms within Linux to notify users that
things have changed either. It only really happens on IBM pseries for
hotplug, which uses a private notifier.

Ben.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help