Re: Large physical address support on e500 platform
From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2010-05-13 12:05:58
From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2010-05-13 12:05:58
On Jan 25, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
=20 On Jan 25, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Aaron Pace wrote: =20quoted
quoted
=20 Is a simple "hello world" module sufficient to show the issue? I'll =
look into it this week.
quoted
quoted
=20 - k=20 It wasn't in my situation, unfortunately. To duplicate this, I had one relatively large kernel module, and then one simple 'hello world' module that did nothing more than call an exported function from the first module as part of its init.=20 Ok, if there is a module or something you can post that reproduces the =
issue that would be extremely helpful. I think we may now have figured this out. - k=