Re: linux-next: PowerPC WARN_ON_ONCE() after merge of the final tree (tip related)
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2010-04-15 06:55:55
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: 2010-04-15 06:55:55
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
From: Ingo Molnar <redacted> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:49:40 +0200
Btw., WARN_ON trapping on PowerPC is clearly a PowerPC bug - there's a good reason we have WARN_ON versus BUG_ON - it should be fixed.
I disagree, an implementation should be allowed to use the most efficient implementation possible for both interfaces. I would be using traps for both on sparc64 if that were really feasible on sparc64 (and actually with gcc-4.5's "asm goto" it might actually be now) The WARN and BUG macros, when implemented without traps, have serious implications for overall code size and register pressure.