Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2010-03-05

Re: [PATCH 7/7] powerpc/85xx: Fix the RapidIO maintenance access functions

From: <hidden>
Date: 2010-03-05 06:11:50

Quoting "Micha Nelissen" [off-list ref]:
Bounine, Alexandre wrote:
quoted
Hi Micha,

I tested it on my setup - it works.
Maybe Thomas may give more details on this change.
Did you (for fun) try once to decrease the maintenance window to =20
say, 4 kB? Then you really need these "high" bits to work properly.
We have never changed the configuration of the window size in Linux, =20
but we have an test application that uses these 4kb window setting.
With the current window configuration in Linux, I expect problems when =20
someone tries to read a register that is located at offset > 512KB. I =20
have currently no equipment to verify this behaviour.
Or did you try with some register at offset > 4MB? The Tundra's have =20
registers going up to 0x14000 or so? So don't need 16MB addressing =20
for that.
We have devices that requires access to registers that are located at =20
offset > 15MB.
Thanks, Micha

quoted
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Micha Nelissen [mailto:micha@neli.hopto.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 3:21 PM
To: Alexandre Bounine
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] powerpc/85xx: Fix the RapidIO maintenance
access functions
quoted
Alexandre Bounine wrote:
quoted
=09out_be32(&priv->maint_atmu_regs->rowtar,
-=09=09 (destid << 22) | (hopcount << 12) | ((offset & ~0x3) >>
9));
quoted
quoted
+=09=09 (destid << 22) | (hopcount << 12) | (offset >> 12));
+=09out_be32(&priv->maint_atmu_regs->rowtear,  (destid >> 10));
Did this actually work for you? The (offset >> 12) is due to the 4MB
window size right?

Micha
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help