Stack size protection broken on ppc64 · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-06
Re: Stack size protection broken on ppc64 · Anton Blanchard <hidden> · 2010-02-06
Re: Stack size protection broken on ppc64 · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-06
[PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-08
[PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-08
Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · KOSAKI Motohiro <hidden> · 2010-02-08
Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · Anton Blanchard <hidden> · 2010-02-08
Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · KOSAKI Motohiro <hidden> · 2010-02-08
Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · Anton Blanchard <hidden> · 2010-02-08
Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · KOSAKI Motohiro <hidden> · 2010-02-08
[PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-08
Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · KOSAKI Motohiro <hidden> · 2010-02-08
Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · Américo Wang <hidden> · 2010-02-08
Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · KOSAKI Motohiro <hidden> · 2010-02-08
[PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-09
Re: [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · KOSAKI Motohiro <hidden> · 2010-02-09
Re: [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-09
Re: [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2010-02-09
Re: [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-09
Re: [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> · 2010-02-09
Re: [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · KOSAKI Motohiro <hidden> · 2010-02-10
Re: [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-10
Re: [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-10
Re: [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> · 2010-02-11
Re: [PATCH] Restrict initial stack space expansion to rlimit · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-11
Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit · Michael Neuling <hidden> · 2010-02-08
Re: Stack size protection broken on ppc64 · Anton Blanchard <hidden> · 2010-02-08

Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit

From: Anton Blanchard <hidden>
Date: 2010-02-08 05:12:27
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

Hi,

Why do we need page size independent stack size? It seems to have
compatibility breaking risk.

I don't think so. The current behaviour is clearly wrong, we dont need a
16x larger stack just because you went from a 4kB to a 64kB base page
size. The user application stack usage is the same in both cases.

Anton

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help