Alexandre Bounine wrote:

 /**
+ * rio_em_set_ops- Sets Error Managment operations for a particular vendor switch
+ * @rdev: RIO device
+ *
+ * Searches the RIO EM ops table for known switch types. If the vid
+ * and did match a switch table entry, then set the em_init() and
+ * em_handle() ops to the table entry values.

Shouldn't any RIO device be able to support error management, not just 
switches?

+/**
+ * rio_pw_enable - Enables/disables port-write handling by a master port
+ * @port: Master port associated with port-write handling
+ * @enable:  1=enable,  0=disable
+ */
+static void rio_pw_enable(struct rio_mport *port, int enable)
+{
+	if (port->ops->pwenable)
+		port->ops->pwenable(port, enable);
+}
+

Maybe this can be done by switch->init function?

+/**
+ * rio_inb_pwrite_handler - process inbound port-write message
+ * @pw_msg: pointer to inbound port-write message
+ *
+ * Processes an inbound port-write message. Returns 0 if the request
+ * has been satisfied.
+ */
+int rio_inb_pwrite_handler(u32 *pw_msg)
+{

Perhaps map this pw_msg to a struct? Or read it into named variables?

+	/* Clear Port Errors */
+	rio_mport_write_config_32(mport, destid, hopcount,
+			rdev->phys_efptr + RIO_PORT_N_ERR_STS_CSR(portnum),
+			err_status & 0x07120204);

Hardcoded value!

+
+	if (rdev->rswitch->port_ok & (1 << portnum)) {
+		if (err_status & RIO_PORT_N_ERR_STS_PORT_UNINIT) {
+			rdev->rswitch->port_ok &= ~(1 << portnum);
+			rio_mport_read_config_32(mport, destid, hopcount,
+				rdev->phys_efptr + RIO_PORT_N_CTL_CSR(portnum),
+				&regval);
+			rio_mport_write_config_32(mport, destid, hopcount,
+				rdev->phys_efptr + RIO_PORT_N_CTL_CSR(portnum),
+				regval | RIO_PORT_N_CTL_LOCKOUT);

You have a function for this?

+			rio_mport_write_config_32(mport, destid, hopcount,
+				rdev->phys_efptr +
+					RIO_PORT_N_ACK_STS_CSR(portnum),
+				RIO_PORT_N_ACK_CLEAR);

This doesn't work for the 568; but the 568 has no special handling?

+	/* Clear Port-Write Pending bit */
+	rio_mport_write_config_32(mport, destid, hopcount,
+			rdev->phys_efptr + RIO_PORT_N_ERR_STS_CSR(portnum),
+			RIO_PORT_N_ERR_STS_PW_PEND);
+DECLARE_RIO_EM_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI572, tsi57x_em_init, tsi57x_em_handler);
+DECLARE_RIO_EM_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI574, tsi57x_em_init, tsi57x_em_handler);
+DECLARE_RIO_EM_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI577, tsi57x_em_init, tsi57x_em_handler);
+DECLARE_RIO_EM_OPS(RIO_VID_TUNDRA, RIO_DID_TSI578, tsi57x_em_init, tsi57x_em_handler);

Why not declare these along with the other ops?

Micha