Thread (51 messages) 51 messages, 5 authors, 2010-03-04

Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] powerpc: implement arch_scale_smt_power for Power7

From: Joel Schopp <hidden>
Date: 2010-01-28 22:39:33
Also in: lkml

What about an early exit if !cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_SMT) ? That would
de-facto compile it out for 32-bit CPU platforms that don't support SMT
at all and avoid some overhead on POWER3,4,970...
  
If the SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER flag isn't set for the sched domain this 
function isn't called.  So an extra check here is wasteful.
  
quoted
+	unsigned long weight = cpumask_weight(sibling_map);
+	unsigned long smt_gain = sd->smt_gain;
+
+	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ASYNC_SMT4) && weight == 4) {
    
So that will only handle the case where all 4 threads are online right ?
There is no provision for the case where the user play tricks like
offlining thread, in which case it will stop trying to "push down"
processes right ? Not a big deal per-se I suppose, just something to be
aware of.
  
I've tested it with manually offlined threads and it behaves as I'd like 
it to.
Also, can you add a comment as to why this is done in the code itself ?
above the if (cpu_has_feature(...)) statement.
  
OK. v3 coming soon with the comment.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help