Re: [v10 PATCH 2/9]: cpuidle: cleanup drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
From: Torsten Duwe <hidden>
Date: 2009-12-07 10:18:25
Also in:
lkml
From: Torsten Duwe <hidden>
Date: 2009-12-07 10:18:25
Also in:
lkml
On Sunday 06 December 2009, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
Peter objected to the idea of integrating this with the old pm_idle because it has already caused a lot of problems on x86 and we wouldn't want to be doing the same mistake on POWER. The discussion related to that could be found here http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/26/233
And BenH has sketched how it should be done on ppc, in that thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/26/624 AFAIS this comment is still valid for v10. Not only I would like to understand what is the conceptual idea behind the other changes. Nothing wrong with cleanups, but there's got to be a purpose and benefits. Torsten