Re: [PATCH] PPC: Sync guest visible MMU state
From: Avi Kivity <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-26 13:20:13
Also in:
kvm
On 11/26/2009 03:16 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
quoted
You can keep pvr out of the (named) union.So we'd have sregs.padded.ppc64.slb?
or sregs.u.ppc64.slb.
I don't see how that is an improvement.
Buildability takes precedence. (an alternative is to drop the union, and add a BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof...)). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function