Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 7 authors, 2009-11-30

Re: [RFC] powerpc/mm: honor O_SYNC flag for memory map

From: Li Yang <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-20 09:23:26

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:00 +0800, Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
quoted
Because there is no way to set mapped memory as cacheable if the
memory
is not managed by Linux kernel. =C2=A0While, it's not rare in real syste=
m
quoted
to
allocate some dedicated memory to a certain application which is not
managed by kernel and then mmap'ed the memory to the application. =C2=A0=
The
quoted
memory should be cacheable but we can't map it to be cacheable due to
this intelligent setting. =C2=A0And it is a big hit to the performance.
Moreover, the standard O_SYNC flag suggest that user has the control
over cacheablity, but actually we had not.
You need to be a bit more careful tho. You must not allow RAM managed by
the kernel to be mapped non-cachable.
Even if the user explicitly sets the O_SYNC flag?  IMHO, it's a bug of
the application if it uses O_SYNC on main memory to be mmap'ed later.
And we don't need to cover up the bug.

- Leo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help