<snip>

+static void invalidate_pte(struct hpte_cache *pte)
+{
+	dprintk_mmu("KVM: Flushing SPT %d: 0x%llx (0x%llx) -> 0x%llx\n",
+		    i, pte->pte.eaddr, pte->pte.vpage, pte->host_va);
+
+	ppc_md.hpte_invalidate(pte->slot, pte->host_va,
+			       MMU_PAGE_4K, MMU_SEGSIZE_256M,
+			       false);

Are we assuming 256M segments here (and elsewhere)?

<snip>

+static int kvmppc_mmu_next_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, ulong esid)
+{
+	int i;
+	int max_slb_size = 64;
+	int found_inval = -1;
+	int r;
+
+	if (!get_paca()->kvm_slb_max)
+		get_paca()->kvm_slb_max = 1;
+
+	/* Are we overwriting? */
+	for (i = 1; i < get_paca()->kvm_slb_max; i++) {
+		if (!(get_paca()->kvm_slb[i].esid & SLB_ESID_V))
+			found_inval = i;
+		else if ((get_paca()->kvm_slb[i].esid & ESID_MASK) == esid)
+			return i;
+	}
+
+	/* Found a spare entry that was invalidated before */
+	if (found_inval > 0)
+		return found_inval;
+
+	/* No spare invalid entry, so create one */
+
+	if (mmu_slb_size < 64)
+		max_slb_size = mmu_slb_size;

Can we just use the global mmu_slb_size eliminate max_slb_size?

<snip>

Mikey