Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2009-11-13

Re: OOPS on MPC8548 board when writing RAID5 array

From: hank peng <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-13 02:45:25
Also in: linux-raid

2009/11/13 Dan Williams [off-list ref]:
Hi Hank,

Thanks for testing.

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:44 AM, hank peng [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
CPU is MPC8548, kernel version is 2.6.31.5,CONFIG_FSL_DMA and
CONFIG_ASYNC_TX_DMA options are all enabled.
#mdadm -C /dev/md0 --assume-clean -l5 -n3 /dev/sd{a,b,c}
#dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/md0 bs=3D1M count=3D1000
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
MPC85xx CDS
Modules linked in:
NIP: c01c45d8 LR: c01c4d48 CTR: 00000000
REGS: c2dd5c80 TRAP: 0700 =C2=A0 Not tainted =C2=A0(2.6.31.5)
MSR: 00029000 <EE,ME,CE> =C2=A0CR: 22004028 =C2=A0XER: 00000000
TASK =3D e820a580[3804] 'md0_raid5' THREAD: c2dd4000
GPR00: 00000001 c2dd5d30 e820a580 c2fb1088 00000001 00000000 00000002 00=
001000
quoted
GPR08: 00000001 c0485a20 00000000 ef8092f8 22002024 55555555 c2d67870 c0=
282d2c
quoted
GPR16: 00001000 e8355c00 c2eff964 00000000 00000000 00000019 01000040 c2=
dd5e00
quoted
GPR24: c2dd5dfc 00000001 c2dd5dc0 c099c420 00000000 c2d67838 00000002 c2=
dd5d58
quoted
NIP [c01c45d8] async_tx_quiesce+0x28/0x74
[..]
quoted
I checked the kernel source code, and find that this OOPS was caused
by the following BUG_ON code:
It is in crypto/async_tx/async_tx.c:
void async_tx_quiesce(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor **tx)
{
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0if (*tx) {
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0/* if ack is alre=
ady set then we cannot be sure
quoted
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 * we are referri=
ng to the correct operation
quoted
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 */
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0BUG_ON(async_tx_t=
est_ack(*tx));
quoted
=C2=A0 /* OOPS occured */
Yes, this looks like a manifestation of the issue I brought up in my
review of the driver [1]. =C2=A0The talitos_prep_dma_xor routine is alway=
s
acknowledging its descriptors, which it should not because that is the
responsibility of the client of the api. =C2=A0When the raid code tries t=
o
attach a memcpy that depends on the xor it sees that it needs to
switch to from talitos to fsldma (or software if fsldma is turned
off). =C2=A0Since talitos does not have the DMA_INTERRUPT capability to
trigger the channel switch we need to perform a synchronous wait for
the xor to complete before submitting the memcpy. =C2=A0When the ack bit =
is
not set the xor descriptor might be recycled by the dma device driver
while we are waiting for it, hence the BUG_ON().
Thanks for reply, Dan.
Forgot to say, when this OOPS happened, I have not applied talitos XOR
patch. I only enabled async_xx api and FSL_DMA, so here
I think XOR was done by CPU and memcpy was done by DMA using async_xx api.
Another interseting thing I should say is that I have tried latest
stable kernel 2.6.31.6, this problem didn't exist. After I applied
talitos XOR patch, it was OK too. I checked the related souce codes
and it seems that there were no changes which make me feel very
confused.

I have been testing latest serials of kernels about XOR patch on
MPC8548 board and I hope Freescale guys also can give me help.
--
Dan

See the final comment:
[1]: http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-raid&m=3D125685641412112&w=3D2


--=20
The simplest is not all best but the best is surely the simplest!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help