Dear Joakim Tjernlund,

In message [ref] you wrote:

quoted

If the application is really using FP instructions a lot, then there
is a huge difference between using soft-float and MATH_EMU; I
remember test cases where soft-float was faster by factors of
500...1000.

Ouch, I had no idea that it could be that much.

Well, consider really simple operations, like FP add or similar, and
compare the library code for the soft-FP implementationagainst the
cost for a trap into the kernel. Or even worse - a consider simple
assignment ("float x, foo; x = foo"); with soft-float: "lis 9,x@ha;
stw 3,x@l(9)" = 2 instructions, with MATH_EMU "lis 9,x@ha; stfs
1,x@l(9)" = 1 insn plus a kernel trap.

For real numbers, run a benchmark that models your real use case.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Little known fact about Middle Earth:   The Hobbits had a very sophi-
sticated computer network!   It was a Tolkien Ring...