Re: Support for S29JL064 in MPC8272ADS?
From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2009-10-16 16:17:40
Roberto Guerra wrote:
mtdparts=phys:1600K(ROM)ro,6M(root),512K(U-Boot)ro,512K(unused) rootfstype=jffs2 => bootm 200000 - 400000 <snip> physmap platform flash device: 00800000 at ff800000 physmap-flash.0: Found 1 x16 devices at 0x0 in 16-bit bank Amd/Fujitsu Extended Query Table at 0x0040 physmap-flash.0: CFI does not contain boot bank location. Assuming top.
Hmm, you seem to be using physmap rather than physmap_of -- so it won't even be looking at your device tree node.
List of all partitions: 0100 4096 ram0 (driver?) 0101 4096 ram1 (driver?) 0102 4096 ram2 (driver?) 0103 4096 ram3 (driver?) 0104 4096 ram4 (driver?) 0105 4096 ram5 (driver?) 0106 4096 ram6 (driver?) 0107 4096 ram7 (driver?) 0108 4096 ram8 (driver?) 0109 4096 ram9 (driver?) 010a 4096 ram10 (driver?) 010b 4096 ram11 (driver?) 010c 4096 ram12 (driver?) 010d 4096 ram13 (driver?) 010e 4096 ram14 (driver?) 010f 4096 ram15 (driver?)
Where are all these coming from?
The key change in my kernel config was the BIG_ENDIAN=Y. The kernel probes the AMD chip, but it can't see the partitions.
Even without partiitons, you should see the whole flash device...
I guess now I will have to define my mtd partitions in either FDT or in the kernel arguments. Which is the best way to define them?
If you're defining a standard layout for the platform that's unlikely to change, I'd go with the device tree. Otherwise, I'd go with whatever's most convenient.
If the partitions are defined in both FDT and bootargs, which one takes precedence?
The command line takes precedence. -Scott