Re: [PATCH] BUILD_BUG_ON: make it handle more cases
From: Américo Wang <hidden>
Date: 2009-10-23 01:50:03
Also in:
linux-next, lkml
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Alan Jenkins [off-list ref] wrote:
On 10/20/09, Am=C3=A9rico Wang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 02:15:33PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:quoted
BUILD_BUG_ON used to use the optimizer to do code elimination or fail at link time; it was changed to first the size of a negative array (a nicer compile time error), then (in 8c87df457cb58fe75b9b893007917cf8095660a0) to a bitfield. bitfields: needs a literal constant at parse time, and can't be put unde=
r
quoted
quoted
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0"if (__builtin_constant_p(x))" for example. negative array: can handle anything, but if the compiler can't tell it's =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0a constant, silently has no effect. link time: breaks link if the compiler can't determine the value, but th=
e
quoted
quoted
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0linker output is not usually as informative as a co=
mpiler error.
quoted
quoted
If we use the negative-array-size method *and* the link time trick, we get the ability to use BUILD_BUG_ON() under __builtin_constant_p() branches, and maximal ability for the compiler to detect errors at build time. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <redacted>diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h --- a/include/linux/kernel.h +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h@@ -683,12 +683,6 @@ struct sysinfo {=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0char _f[20-2*sizeof(long)-sizeof(int)]; /* Padding:=
libc5 uses this.. */
quoted
quoted
}; -/* Force a compilation error if condition is true */ -#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) ((void)BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(condition)) - -/* Force a compilation error if condition is constant and true */ -#define MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON(cond) ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2 * !!(cond)])) - /* Force a compilation error if condition is true, but also produce a =C2=A0 =C2=A0result (of value 0 and type size_t), so the expression can=
be used
quoted
quoted
=C2=A0 =C2=A0e.g. in a structure initializer (or where-ever else comma =
expressions
quoted
quoted
@@ -696,6 +690,33 @@ struct sysinfo {#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) (sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); })) #define BUILD_BUG_ON_NULL(e) ((void *)sizeof(struct { int:-!!(e); })) +/** + * BUILD_BUG_ON - break compile if a condition is true. + * @cond: the condition which the compiler should know is false. + * + * If you have some code which relies on certain constants being equal,=
or
quoted
quoted
+ * other compile-time-evaluated condition, you should use BUILD_BUG_ON =
to
quoted
quoted
+ * detect if someone changes it. + * + * The implementation uses gcc's reluctance to create a negative array, but + * gcc (as of 4.4) only emits that error for obvious cases (eg. not arguments + * to inline functions). =C2=A0So as a fallback we use the optimizer; i=
f it
quoted
quoted
can't + * prove the condition is false, it will cause a link error on the undefined + * "__build_bug_on_failed". =C2=A0This error message can be harder to t=
rack
quoted
quoted
down + * though, hence the two different methods. + */ +#ifndef __OPTIMIZE__ +#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)]=
))
quoted
quoted
+#else +extern int __build_bug_on_failed;Hmm, what exactly is __build_bug_on_failed?Well, we haven't added a definition for it in this patch. =C2=A0I'm sure grep will tell you it wasn't defined before hand either. =C2=A0So any reference to it is an error - which will be reported at link time.quoted
quoted
+#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0\
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 do { =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0\
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(=
condition)])); =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0\
quoted
quoted
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 if (condition) __build_bug_o=
n_failed =3D 1; =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 \
If "condition" is known false at compile time, gcc -O will eliminate the code which refers to __build_bug_on_failed. =C2=A0If it's not proved =
to
be false - it will break the build, which is exactly what we want BUILD_BUG_ON to do.
Ah, clever trick! Got it. Thanks! Reviewed-by: WANG Cong <redacted>