Re: [PATCH] perf_event, powerpc: Fix compilation after big perf_counter rename
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2009-10-01 11:13:11
Also in:
lkml
Attachments
- (unnamed) [application/pgp-signature] 198 bytes
From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2009-10-01 11:13:11
Also in:
lkml
Hi Ingo, On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:42:01 +0200 Ingo Molnar [off-list ref] wrote:
* Stephen Rothwell [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:25:55 +1000 Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Give me a day or two, I should be able to add a per-branch setting for who to send mails to without too much trouble.In the mean time I don't now if someone has pointed you at these today: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/12/That's an upstream warning.
When I sent that to you, I was referring to these build results: http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/1307802/ which (as you say) was only a waning in the rest of the kernel but is turned into an error by the -Werror we use when building arch/powerpc. The warning came from commit 4765c1db84c73f775eb1822a009117cbae524e9e ("rcu-tiny: The Bloatwatch Edition, v6") in the -tip tree and fixed by commit 5ef9b8e59c043624fb44e31439cecf7f8b4cd62a ("rcu: Clean up the warning message about RCU not defined") the next day (in the -tip tree). So no big problem. Neither of these commits are upstream. I was just filling in the role of notifying you of build problems until Michael can automate it. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/