On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 17:05 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 23:51 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
quoted
From: Michel Dänzer <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <redacted>
---
Hi Michel !
While your two previous patches apply just fine, this one doesn't,
the uninorth_insert_memory() function seems to be slightly different
upstream. Does this depend on some separate yet unapplied patches ?
I previously sent the attached patches to Dave in the course of the
radeon KMS issues thread. Not sure which of these he's picked up yet, if
any.
I'm putting 1/3 and 2/3 into my -test branch and they should hit my
-next branch in a couple of days.
Or do you prefer us to merge that via Dave ?
The thing is, stuff in -powerpc is much more likely to get some amount
of testing on actual ppc hardware than stuff in random other trees :-)
I'm fine with either way.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer