In message: <955e48b80908281105q60c057e8pfc16213f17da9138@mail.gmail.co=
m>
            Stuart Yoder [off-list ref] writes:
: > Lets *not* do it on power.org. =A0I'd like to see the bindings used=
 by
: > more than just powerpc people, and power.org might become a bit of =
a
: > mental barrier for non-powerpc folks. =A0kernel.org would be a good=

: > host. =A0So would ozlabs or infradead. =A0Or I'd be happy to mainta=
in one
: > on secretlab.
: =

: I think broadening it beyond power.org is good.  Along those lines I'=
d prefer
: not having this on kernel.org, as device trees are not Linux-centric.=
  There
: are other OS vendors I've interacted with that I'd like to see use de=
vice trees
: and separating it from Linux may be better IMO.

I know of at least one other free OS that will be migrating to device
trees for enumeration of devices in the embedded space...

Warner