Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2009-08-28

Re: [RFC] Clock binding

From: M. Warner Losh <hidden>
Date: 2009-08-28 18:23:20
Also in: linux-devicetree

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

In message: <955e48b80908281105q60c057e8pfc16213f17da9138@mail.gmail.co=
m>
            Stuart Yoder [off-list ref] writes:
: > Lets *not* do it on power.org. =A0I'd like to see the bindings used=
 by
: > more than just powerpc people, and power.org might become a bit of =
a
: > mental barrier for non-powerpc folks. =A0kernel.org would be a good=

: > host. =A0So would ozlabs or infradead. =A0Or I'd be happy to mainta=
in one
: > on secretlab.
: =

: I think broadening it beyond power.org is good.  Along those lines I'=
d prefer
: not having this on kernel.org, as device trees are not Linux-centric.=
  There
: are other OS vendors I've interacted with that I'd like to see use de=
vice trees
: and separating it from Linux may be better IMO.

I know of at least one other free OS that will be migrating to device
trees for enumeration of devices in the embedded space...

Warner
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help