Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb()

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:11:13 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 15:56 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:

quoted

quoted

I would like to merge the new support that depends on this in 2.6.32,
so unless there's major objections, I'd like this to go in early during
the merge window. We can sort out separately how to carry the patch
around in -next until then since the powerpc tree will have a dependency
on it.

Can't see any problem with that.

CC'ing Linus here. How do you want to proceed with that merge ? (IE. so
far nobody objected to the patch itself)

IE. The patch affects all archs, though it's a trivial change every
time, but I'll have stuff in powerpc-next that depends on it, and so I'm
not sure what the right approach is here. Should I put it in the powerpc
tree ?

I also didn't have any formal Ack from anybody, neither mm folks nor
arch maintainers :-)

Well the change is trivial, it just adds another unused argument to the
macros. For the records: it still compiles on s390.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.